Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:13:36 -0800
From:      Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        bsam@ipt.ru, af.gourmet@videotron.ca, perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: >1 linux_base port (Re: 7.2 amd64 Flash)
Message-ID:  <200907260013.36679.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net>
In-Reply-To: <4a6c04f5.kCRwnNHuKXMD2Eoc%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
References:  <4A6B6A25.2040508@videotron.ca> <46921322@ipt.ru> <4a6c04f5.kCRwnNHuKXMD2Eoc%perryh@pluto.rain.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 25 July 2009 23:25:41 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> wrote:
> > PJ <af.gourmet@videotron.ca> writes:
> > > I already had f8 installed as well as fc-4
> >
> > That's wrong. Two linux_base ports should not be installed
> > at a system ...
>
> Might it be advisable for each new linux_base port to declare
> itself incompatible with all earlier ones, to prevent this
> kind of error?  (Cc: ports@)

They are, -f8/Makefile:
CONFLICTS=              linux_base-gentoo* linux_base-fc4 linux_base-fc6 \
                        linux_base-f7 linux-glib2

Someone installed with DISABLE_CONFLICTS and has a bleeding foot.
-- 
Mel



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200907260013.36679.mel.flynn%2Bfbsd.questions>