Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:04:56 +0900 (JST) From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com> To: krion@voodoo.oberon.net Cc: maho@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [ports-i386@FreeBSD.org: da-ooodict-DK-1.20050518 failed on i386 6] Message-ID: <20050816.170456.59469554.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20050815075441.GE23112@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <20050814161616.GG6190@voodoo.oberon.net> <20050815.102003.74737193.chat95@mac.com> <20050815075441.GE23112@voodoo.oberon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In Message-ID: <20050815075441.GE23112@voodoo.oberon.net> Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:20:03AM +0900, NAKATA Maho wrote: > > Dear portmgr, > > > > I recieved many :) e-mails that ooodict related ports are > > broken at the moment. > > > > ooodict-all has many zip files as distfiles, and they are just > > dictionary/hypen/thesoras data. I cannot check exactly what > > have been updated, but I'm quite sure this is just update of > > such data, and there are no security risk. > > > > could you please approve my commit? > > Generally we can't approve fixes if we don't know what changes were > done in tarballs, knowing such info would be good. But if you > assure these are only dictionary/hypen/thesoras changes, I approve > it. Thank you for your reply. This port is really hard for me to maintain (in this case it would be much difficult to say all the ZIPs are just dico etc. I should think about much more robust mechanism... So, I skip fixation of this port for now. Thank you again! -- NAKATA, Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050816.170456.59469554.chat95>