Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 18:07:13 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> Cc: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>, Dag-Erling =?utf-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r304142 - head/usr.sbin/bsdinstall/partedit Message-ID: <20160817150713.GO8192@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <4a28f419-5293-0753-068d-1e07ddb01c2d@selasky.org> References: <201608150930.u7F9UL1V069576@repo.freebsd.org> <e3454e8e-5d98-5bec-21de-8ea0db2b9b08@freebsd.org> <861t1n6749.fsf@desk.des.no> <581c856c-826b-529e-c9c6-a397fb679708@freebsd.org> <20160817144944.GM22212@zxy.spb.ru> <4a28f419-5293-0753-068d-1e07ddb01c2d@selasky.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 05:00:16PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On 08/17/16 16:49, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 07:36:00AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > > > In long term, prefered aligment is forsing 4k (or may be more): > > install system on 512b [mirror] disk aligment now may be need required replace > > disk to 4k aligment. For more flexsible in future now best chois is 4k > > or more. > > Hi, > > Not sure if it is an issue, but what will happen if a magic disk has a > size less than 4K and uses a block size of 512bytes and the disk > alignment gets rounded up to 4K. Will any of logic in this patch fail or > hang? I am not sure about understunding you. Do you talk about disk total size of 1536 bytes and less?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160817150713.GO8192>