Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 20:05:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making a dynamically-linked root Message-ID: <16091.58932.136814.96996@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030602231759.GE1345@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20030602171942.GA87863@roark.gnf.org> <xzp4r3844eb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030602202947.GE87863@roark.gnf.org> <xzpznl02nry.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <200306022125.h52LPhhc002291@apollo.backplane.com> <20030602214956.GG87863@roark.gnf.org> <20030602224734.GC1345@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030602225807.GI87863@roark.gnf.org> <20030602231759.GE1345@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marcel Moolenaar writes: > technical reasons why we should allow it). Most, if not all resistence > is about making it the default (AFAICT). Let's allow it first. Have a > bike shed about the default later. I'm in 100% agreement with this. Drew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?16091.58932.136814.96996>