Date: Wed, 18 Mar 1998 18:39:24 -0500 From: Drew Derbyshire - UUPC/extended software support <software@kew.com> To: "Michael V. Harding" <mvh@netcom.com> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 'Code Freeze' Message-ID: <35105B2C.F7ECD15D@kew.com> References: <199803181311.FAA02549@netcom1.netcom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael V. Harding wrote: > I'll have to agree with the below - my experience has been that the > CDs are the LEAST stable releases. I agree. I only use the 2.2.5 CD-ROM for the ports disc. > There always seems to be some ugly bug discovered > within a month of the CD going to press This is very true. It occurred to me at one point suggest that another point be added to the 2.2.5 release (2.2.5.1) to fix all the minor problems. But that should be the function of the 2.2.? level. Put another way, why did the disk slice code have to go onto -stable? How did it "improve" the stable environment? -- Drew Derbyshire UUPC/extended e-mail: software@kew.com Telephone: 617-279-9812 "Never test for a bug you don't know how to fix." - QA manager To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35105B2C.F7ECD15D>