Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 18:40:52 -0800 From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Tom <tom@sdf.com> Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG, dunham@dunham.org Subject: Re: very slow scsi performance Message-ID: <199802190240.SAA13214@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> In-Reply-To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> "Re: very slow scsi performance" (Feb 19, 12:54pm)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 19, 12:54pm, Greg Lehey wrote: } Subject: Re: very slow scsi performance } >>> and 2.1 were solid). This, of course, only applies to the 2.5-inch } >>> drives, but it's an indication that IBM doesn't walk on water. Based } >>> upon what I see internally (and I don't see everything), I'd choose } >>> IBM first, Fujitsu second, Quantum third, and Seagate fourth, but that } >>> ranking could easily be scrambled if you based it upon individual } >>> products, rather than overall records. } IDE drives are a different matter, but I think you're still being } unfair. A lot of IDE drives differ from SCSI drives only by the } interface. He's also talking about 2.5-inch drives. So far as I know there aren't any 2.5-inch SCSI drives. --- Truck To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802190240.SAA13214>