Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 05:45:09 +0000 From: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org> To: Laura Marie Feeney <lmfeeney@sics.se> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: suspend/resume on Lenovo X1 (regression from reports on wiki) Message-ID: <20130831054509.GI32399@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <522118EB.5090801@sics.se> References: <521D03AE.3050709@sics.se> <CAJ-VmokcQOhAE6y_=J1uzPHneSF%2BjYSpdo%2Bwdf7Gd0h36pRHwQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130830145102.GG32399@FreeBSD.org> <201308301153.23184.jhb@freebsd.org> <20130830215355.GH32399@FreeBSD.org> <522118EB.5090801@sics.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:12:59AM +0200, Laura Marie Feeney wrote: > On 08/30/13 23:53, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > > >>Maybe try x11perf before and after? I just removed VESA from my kernel on an > >>X220 and it now suspends and resumes great in X. I don't notice any slowdown, > >>but I'm using a very simple tiling window manager (i3wm). > > > >I'm also using i3 now, previously it was fvwm2 earlier with slowdown. > >Hmm... > > > >Gleb and Luara, could you try x11-wm/i3 for suspend/resume trick and check > >slowdown? > > I was using twm (like i3, it's very lightweight window manager and > actually my personal preference for everyday use) and saw little or > no slowdown under normal use. (I was able to get the cpu load to > spike quite a bit higher by scrolling an xterm as fast as I could, > but that's not very normal.) The main difference in these two wms its toolkits - i3 mostly uses a xcb, twm uses a widget toolkit and it looks like xcb works well... -- Sergey A. Osokin osa@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130831054509.GI32399>