Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 22:54:31 +0200 (EET) From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: n@nectar.com (Jacques A. Vidrine) Cc: sobomax@FreeBSD.org (Maxim Sobolev), freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ksh93 Message-ID: <200102282054.f1SKsav55630@vic.sabbo.net> In-Reply-To: <20010228144526.A54409@spawn.nectar.com> from "Jacques A. Vidrine" at Feb 28, 2001 02:45:26 PM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:36:42PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Well, inaccessible /usr excludes possibility to log-in remotely > > (inetd lives in /usr as well as demons from /usr/libexec). Therefore, > > in such case static non-standard shell in /bin makes little or > > no difference as user has to attend console anyway. > > Correct, just as in the case of a broken libc.so. Not always. In the case of incompatible ABI changes (e.g. recent libc madness) parts of the base may work because they are built as part of the world, while any or all third-party apps will be hosed. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102282054.f1SKsav55630>