Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:03:46 -0700
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>
Cc:        fs@freebsd.org, rmacklem@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: nfs pessimized by vnode pages changes
Message-ID:  <20160329030346.GI2616@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160329122721.D1549@besplex.bde.org>
References:  <20160327144755.Y4269@besplex.bde.org> <20160329090209.Q1020@besplex.bde.org> <20160329001623.GC2616@FreeBSD.org> <20160329122721.D1549@besplex.bde.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 01:24:27PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
B> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:59:26AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
B> > ...
B> >
B> > B> I couldn't get full-fs-block input to work right in ncl_getpages().  In
B> > B> the old version, vm_fault_hold() almost always calls it with the pages
B> > B> for exactly 1 full block, because vm_fault_additional_pages() somehow
B> > B> finds this many pages.
B> >
B> > The last quoted paragraph is a correct observation. According to your
B> > investigations, prior to r292373 NFS was doing multiple page pageins,
B> > despite it should have reported that it can't. My reading of the code
B> > is the same: both before r292373 and after r292373 NFS should page in
B> > a single page at request. I quickly reviewed the whole codepath and I
B> > can't see how with older code it was able to do multiple page pageins.
B> 
B> I found it.  In old versions, vm_fault_additional_pages() exists and
B> calls vnode_pager_haspage() to locate some additional pages.
B> VOP_BMAP() is vop_stdbmap() for nfs.  This doesn't locate any
B> additional fs blocks, but vnode_pager_haspage() locates the page within
B> the single nfs block and returns the number of pages to read behind and
B> ahead to fill in the block.

Ah. I also looked at stdbmap, but missed that it doesn't actually return
error value.

I will come up with a patch.

B> Probably similarly in most file systems that don't really support bmap.
B> They can always use vop_stdbmap().  Probably they mostly do, so the
B> fallback code for when VOP_BMAP() fails is mostly unreachable.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160329030346.GI2616>