Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2001 13:24:12 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: <ia64@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Woohoo! Message-ID: <20011006132226.U530-100000@salmon.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <20011006111721.40C7F3808@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 6 Oct 2001, Peter Wemm wrote: > Doug Rabson wrote: > > > > > I'll put up a new set of userland binaries today. > > > > > > Do you have a matching libgcc.a from your toolchain? You never updated the > > > one in ~dfr on freefall. I stole the libgcc.a from redhat 7.1 to fill the > > > void. > > > > I stubbed out libgcc.a ages ago and haven't needed anything from it yet. > > I couldn't even compile bin/sh without it.. There were undefined > divide functions.. > > > > What do you use for __flt_rounds() (#define FLT_ROUNDS __flt_rounds() > > > in <ia64/include/float.h>)? I cheated there too. > > > > I haven't needed this yet either. > > strtod() wanted it, as called by bin/sh. Odd. I wonder where I'm getting these from - I have no trouble building things with the toolchain which I uploaded today. > > > > I was about to embark on a userland build and do some research into what > > > it will take to add ia64 bits to ld-elf.so.1 and the associated crt* files. > > > On the other hand, maybe keeping it all static is an idea for now. > > > > Static is probably fine for now. I've been building bits and pieces as I > > need them. I'm still having problems getting the sodding disklabel to > > stick. I hate that code - the label write protection is stopping me from > > writing the label and 'disklabel -W' doesn't bloody work. > > Heh. I used mdconfig to create a pre-labelled disk image, and scp'ed that > to the linux box and dd'ed it to the second scsi drive I added to the box. I think I managed it this time. Hexdump could see it anyway. Lets see if its still there after rebooting... > > ethernet is really unhappy. I tried ifconfig'ing up the fxp and got some > good mess on the wire. When it tried to ping something, the other > host saw this.. Note the extra bytes.. it looks like it would be roughly > correct if the "0900 0000" got removed. Problems with ntohl etc. I've committed a fix. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Phone: +44 20 8348 6160 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ia64" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011006132226.U530-100000>