Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:55:41 -0500 From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> To: Adriaan de Groot <groot@kde.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: first time with a 64bit CPU ... kernel config ... Message-ID: <AAE3EE0A-964E-421B-A47B-B4BB0D2A9B57@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <20060116214414.P76671@hex.athame.co.uk> References: <20060110235259.N1006@ganymede.hub.org> <4294ECA5-C8B6-484A-94BA-5EBC61498280@khera.org> <20060114012450.U28752@ganymede.hub.org> <D3F5D17A-028D-481D-81A8-D1BCE6BD0137@khera.org> <20060116214414.P76671@hex.athame.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 16, 2006, at 2:46 PM, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Vivek Khera wrote: >> On Jan 14, 2006, at 12:26 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>> Just curious, but is there anything i want to add to make.conf? >>> My i386 boxes, I have: >>> CFLAGS= -O -mpentium -pipe -g -DKVA_PAGES=512 >>> COPTFLAGS= -O -mpentium -pipe -DKVA_PAGES=512 >> >> nope. if anything, you can set CPUTYPE=nacona for your Intel >> EM64T box, but I don't see any difference than leaving it blank. > > Probably because the CPU is called a Nocona by Intel; presumably > the CPUTYPE flag would also want it spelled correctly. That said, > there used to be no point in setting CPUTYPE because there's just > one amd64 instruction set and optimization profile that gcc knows > about - I'm not sure if that is still the case. > > Please see http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/2004- November/002661.html for the last paragraph commentary. Personally, for the co-lo facility I like to have a single buildworld image and packages to install on everything so I don't specify any CPUTYPEs.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AAE3EE0A-964E-421B-A47B-B4BB0D2A9B57>