Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:01:53 -0400
From:      mikel king <mikel.king@olivent.com>
To:        Drew Tomlinson <drew@mykitchentable.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions <questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 'at' command syntax
Message-ID:  <36603AA6-76EB-4AFF-A5F9-DEF6C6CCF969@olivent.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BDB1F42.9090005@mykitchentable.net>
References:  <4BDB0ACA.7040805@mykitchentable.net> <81347FF5-3BA7-47CC-90CD-2CD9881DCDC6@drainfade.com> <4BDB1F42.9090005@mykitchentable.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Apr 30, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Drew Tomlinson wrote:

> On 4/30/2010 10:11 AM, Allie Daneman wrote:
>> Read the man page...that should shed light on the issue.
>>
>> Sent from my electronic slavery device.
>
> [snip]
>
>>> I've read the man page over and over.
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> I started there but guess I am dense.  However Thomas' post told me  
> that I have to use 'echo' or 'cat' and the pipe to feed 'at' from  
> the command line.  I wasn't grasping that I had to do it in this  
> manner.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Drew

BSD users are normally more civil and will at least point you to the  
section of the manual or even a good how to if we don't have the time  
to write one for you. RTFM responses are normally left to the Linux  
crowd and their lists.

I hope that Thomas' note earlier shed some light on the subject.

Cheers,
Mikel King
Senior Editor, BSD News Network
Columnist, BSD Magazine
6 Alpine Court,
Medford, NY 11763
http://www.linkedin.com/in/mikelking
http://twitter.com/mikelking




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36603AA6-76EB-4AFF-A5F9-DEF6C6CCF969>