Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 22:56:26 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> To: Coleman Kane <cokane@one.net>, Jeff Fisher <jeff@jeffenstein.org> Cc: Coleman Kane <cokane@one.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What is needed in /stand Message-ID: <v0422080ab50c1240f6d9@[194.78.233.215]> In-Reply-To: <20000401135701.A11341@evil.2y.net> References: <20000401004437.A6904@evil.2y.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004011039040.41431-100000@localhost> <20000401135701.A11341@evil.2y.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 1:57 PM -0500 2000/4/1, Coleman Kane wrote: >> On the systems that I've set up, /tmp has always been a seperate >> filesystem. > > Yeah, same here. If I ever have to set up a system where /tmp needs a lot of disk space, or could use an option like softupdates enabled, I always put it on a separate filesystem, or perhaps a memory-based filesystem. Many years ago I learned that making /tmp a symlink to /usr/tmp was a bad idea. -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ====================================================================== Brad Knowles, <blk@skynet.be> || Belgacom Skynet SA/NV Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin || Rue Colonel Bourg, 124 Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/12.49 || B-1140 Brussels http://www.skynet.be || Belgium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v0422080ab50c1240f6d9>