Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 19:01:37 -0500 (CDT) From: David Scheidt <dscheidt@tumbolia.com> To: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net> Cc: <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: brainstorm: "intermediate" disk caching Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.32L2.0105281858470.86403-100000@shell-1.enteract.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0105281800050.6337-100000@www.everquick.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 May 2001, E.B. Dreger wrote: : :Of course, with 36 GB drives readily available, maybe I shouldn't worry :until I have a database larger than 72 GB. ;-) If you're really interested in database performance, remember "Spindles is good." Spreading your IO load over as many seperate disks, on as many independent IO channels as practical will improve performance. David -- dscheidt@tumbolia.com Bipedalism is only a fad. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.32L2.0105281858470.86403-100000>