Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:29:08 -0500 From: Klaus Steden <klaus@compt.com> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: "Jack L. Stone" <jacks@sage-american.com>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind Message-ID: <20021114122907.E36056@cthulu.compt.com> In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.0.20021114122014.067d0a68@marble.sentex.ca>; from mike@sentex.net on Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:20:54PM -0500 References: <20021114163327.GD23981@madman.nectar.cc> <20021114.161925.95516452.ishizuka@ish.org> <200211140624.gAE6OXcA038916@freefall.freebsd.org> <20021114.161925.95516452.ishizuka@ish.org> <3.0.5.32.20021114111020.0102afe0@sage-american.com> <5.1.1.6.0.20021114122014.067d0a68@marble.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> At 11:10 AM 14/11/2002 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: > >I believe the "&&" construct is now deprecated in FBSD-4.7..... > > > I think you were thinking of && & which is no longer "supported" > Isn't '&&' a shell construct? Why would it be deprecated since all it does is indicate to the shell to run the command immediately following it pending the successful completion of the command immediately preceding it? Not to split hairs or anything, but did I miss a meeting or something? Klaus To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021114122907.E36056>