Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:16:59 +0100 From: Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>, Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r346114 - head/devel/p4.el Message-ID: <20140310141659.GG11135@gahrfit.gahr.ch> In-Reply-To: <3D82157DD87FC9C0C7724278@ogg.in.absolight.net> References: <201402260657.s1Q6vEsH059562@svn.freebsd.org> <BEE32AF42CDC7ED09B7234F0@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20140226123420.f5c0d0ff40b404a70334da4b@FreeBSD.org> <20140310072423.GC11693@FreeBSD.org> <f8e85ff21f349babc099b00d8207a8b2@apnoea.adamw.org> <3D82157DD87FC9C0C7724278@ogg.in.absolight.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Dx9iWuMxHO1cCoFc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2014-Mar-10, 14:38, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 10 mars 2014 08:32:52 -0400 Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> wrote: > | On 2014/03/10 03:24, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > |> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:34:20PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > |>> Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > |>> > Taking one amongst many, the current practice is to mute the MKDIR > |>> > and not mute commands that install files. Would you mind respecting > |>> > that in the future ? > |>=20 > |>> This is just a matter of opinion. I've always preferred to see what is > |>> being installed or what direcories are being created. Even the example > |>> in the PHB doesn't mute the mkdir. Unless this gets correcte in the= =20 > |>> PHB > |>> I won't change this. > |=20 > | Alexey - > |=20 > | You make this request every few days, it seems, and the response is > | always the same: it's not in the PHB. > |=20 > | You should put it there. It SHOULD be policy. We should strive for > | consistency across ports. The ports tree should present a unified > | experience for all ports, for all users. >=20 > Yes, sorry, it's not in the PHB yet, I'm at section 6.7 at the momment, a= nd > I'm updating things as I go. >=20 > (And yes, if you're applying old policies from chapters 1 to 5, you should > go and have a look, things may have changed.) ports-policy-change-announce@ comes to mind :) Has anybody else ever felt the desire to get notified whenever a policy is updated? Just to avoid having to skim through commit logs. --=20 Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --Dx9iWuMxHO1cCoFc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTHclWXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXREQTZERTEwNkE1Qjg1NEI4NUREODZENDlB REQwRDM4RUExOTIwODlFAAoJEK3Q046hkgieds4P/jnOrrBe/MQv8Ez+Pb4yf8ph yPZ0ouRJTrjDjGkrytefZGHnUSWjgrckZsTa3QWhA2L5V/F1B3q8Sbn4e/p+9LfF dl95f/b4HWIrIkX2eimmxy1LL44eEwGpjmBablKYmtZBVrfXFLyVbDoINco1qSP5 +JsUWTo0XGwg0bLq/CqePuvEZj2SAzo8mPrvlJNlqdVNe/5J5HCnj04ar2dAAEGU dkLOsXUZO90teIiE5zPjPHh+ioczo0+YnSvs+PqcTK0qFNmCzUXOdgcC3izeht1R Ftw/UOf2pb/qi+3JtxBr1mO4M9CljRMu2ZJnCyh2Yz81PGtN0BMQSfP2e3bDPg7Q vxiwAa6G/poRl405ff8qVNzMq7GxyL/kFYsIsDfQBNjV6CIrJgSXey4uihCL064c 9ZPmIJv0GxWWMy9OunjOoECVq1UgBLhCtGmfKnEF5oONdb2hCZKJ+cs0zxJ/pAOq hSTo2Ohg/mU2cRISs+vFCynsSYbJMxz2epnvgh14bslbs5r4Zu8yzK0RtB4zxnzf AEt15Onga3a7wsPgDgKsbaN1IGUAUDUU+cIo7LUFRNfEH4TM3FHXp0aIQuVc7Kly 0xdYYsxT+J3p7mQVckFt2cBLaRRYrZrCtcUHOEM/6Df2BFF5o/lPSqUh6yvLFC3H pC2PSmV8ARekgp4txx0C =QLIN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dx9iWuMxHO1cCoFc--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140310141659.GG11135>