Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:05:42 +0800 From: LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>, LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net>, Rong-En Fan <rafan@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, peter@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/ncurses Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <459E22F6.7080904@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <20070105084653.GA55752@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200701050416.l054GdiB019234@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070105065744.GA54729@nagual.pp.ru> <20070105074434.GF20739@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <459E08CD.8020807@delphij.net> <20070105084653.GA55752@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7FCB319BD7D946F728081735 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andrey Chernov wrote: > On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 04:14:05PM +0800, LI Xin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Rong-En Fan wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 09:57:45AM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 04:16:39AM +0000, Rong-En Fan wrote: >>>>> rafan 2007-01-05 04:16:39 UTC >>>>> >>>>> FreeBSD ports repository >>>>> >>>>> Modified files: >>>>> devel/ncurses Makefile pkg-plist=20 >>>>> Log: >>>>> - Enable terminfo again, can be turned off via WITHOUT_TERMINFO [= 1] >>>>> - Partially address bin/71801 >>>>> - terminfo and termcap are both enabled by default >>>> Do you think its time now to upgrade our old system ncurses 5.2 to=20 >>>> something more recent like 5.6? Could you handle it, please? >>> Yes, absolute! Check bin/99807, which is waiting peter@'s reviewing. >> It might be a good idea to post a "Call for tester" on -current@ or >> -arch@ with patches. Also, please let kris@ know the upcoming change = so >> he would be able to give you invaluable feedback from the ports cluste= r. >=20 > I think calling -arch@ for testers is superfluous, this library does no= t=20 > affects system architecture. Ports cluster perhaps needed or perhaps no= t=20 I agree. Maybe -arch@ for testers is an overkill. > because new ncurses _is_ the port now, and tested with other ports.=20 I think ports cluster is needed, if there is some ports that depends on base ncurses (we have years of stale ncurses in base and it's possible that some ports depends or say, misuse that fact)... If there is no API/ABI change in the new ncurses then it would be Ok to just go ahead and commit the change, however, we have 15K+ ports so making sure is mostly a safety belt :-) > Calling -current@, I agree. Cheers, --=20 Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! --------------enig7FCB319BD7D946F728081735 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFniL2OfuToMruuMARA4f8AJ9ylbnaadkiGWMGl7qL8frI9ZesUQCZAemo 3xk360jdbv58WbieuY52pF8= =H4p/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7FCB319BD7D946F728081735--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?459E22F6.7080904>