Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:35:10 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/unifdef unifdef.1 Message-ID: <20021204173510.GA43776@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20021204171417.GC54997@sunbay.com> References: <200212041442.gB4EgnQL042381@repoman.freebsd.org> <20021204150932.GA47420@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <20021204154157.GA49926@sunbay.com> <20021204164938.GB90851@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20021204171005.GB54997@sunbay.com> <20021204171417.GC54997@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:14:17PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 07:10:05PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Also, here are a few statistics from our mdoc(7) manpages: > > > > NULL: 897 > > null: 387 > > NUL: 139 > > nul: 14 > > > > Similar statistics from doc/en_US.ISO8859-1: > > > > NULL - 99, null - 335, NUL - 5, nul - 2 > > > POSIX.1-2001 definition: > > 3.242 NUL > A character with all bits set to zero. > > The same statistics from POSIX.1-2001 draft 7: > > NULL: 245 > null: 924 > NUL: 65 > nul: 5 > > Do you need more? :-) It doesn't matter how many sources you quote showing inconsistency. MANY people explicitly use nul/NUL vs. null/NULL to distinguish between '\0' and "#include <stdio.h>'s NULL". Please consider changing the spelling to the form many FreeBSD'ers seem to be preferring. We don't have to always follow the Linux/POSUX masses. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021204173510.GA43776>