Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Dec 1999 20:16:00 -0500
From:      "Vladimir N. Silyaev" <vsilyaev@mindspring.com>
To:        Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "Vladimir N. Silyaev" <vsilyaev@mindspring.com>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Multiple instances of the same character device
Message-ID:  <19991213201600.A253@jupiter.delta.ny.us>
In-Reply-To: <199912130839.AAA06175@mass.cdrom.com>; from msmith@freebsd.org on Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 12:39:42AM -0800
References:  <19991211173336.A635@jupiter.delta.ny.us> <199912130839.AAA06175@mass.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 12:39:42AM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > 
> > The question is very simple. Is it possible to open the same character
> > pseudo device, for example /dev/foo0, simultaneously from other programs, and 
> > to work with this instances independently? 
> 
> Not in the fashion that I believe you're trying to do, no.
> 
> > I'm asked as the developer of a driver with such requirements, so please
> > don't complain about such technique.
> 
> I think I'm going to complain anyway; this is an _extremely_ lame way to 
> do things, and it breaks many assumptions about how files are meant to 
> work.
> 
> In your case, however, you can probably steal the 'emuldata' field in the 
> proc structure to store a pointer to your per-instance data.  At some 
> stage, the Linux emulator will want to use this as well, and it will need 
> to provide an API for multiple emulator plugins to use.
Oh no, I think it's a bad idea to store something in the proc structure,
because program want two different devices with such semantics, and it
some time 'forked'.  And in common, it's a very dirty hack, and it's
doesn't remove the 'last close' problem.

Probably I'll be try to do something like 'rotated' symlink, or intercept
linux open syscall and substitute devices like /dev/foo0a, /dev/foo0b,
until don't open one.

> 
> By then I hope that we'll have convinced the VMware folks to do things 
> properly, or have our own binary version...
Ya-ya, I hope too.

-- 
Vladimir Silyaev


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991213201600.A253>