Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:48:55 +0000 From: Lee Dilkie <Lee@Dilkie.com> To: Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Default inode number too low in FFS nowadays? Message-ID: <4EB14A47.8010107@Dilkie.com> In-Reply-To: <4EB1476A.3070204@digsys.bg> References: <B888842A-7DB4-491B-93E3-A376745019F5@sarenet.es> <20111102131311.GA56941@icarus.home.lan> <4EB1476A.3070204@digsys.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/2/2011 1:36 PM, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > > > On 02.11.11 15:13, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 12:57:33PM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote: >>> Today I?ve come across an issue long ago forgotten :) Running out of >>> i-nodes. >> [...] >> >> There's a reason /usr on FreeBSD defaults to "all the remaining space on >> the disk" if you pick the defaults/auto. Surprise. :-) >> >> The summarised version is: >> >> 1. You have control over this yourself: newfs(8) -i flag. You can even >> input this flag during sysinstall when building a new system. >> >> [...] > > Just for the completeness of it, one would use ZFS and be done with > this issue. :-) Are you suggesting that ZFS be the default FS? My only concern with ZFS is that it still appears to be in flux and have some issues. I don't know, from monitoring this list, if those are issues that heavy load users experience and ZFS is as stable as UFS or if it isn't. I just know I see issues being raised. -lee
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EB14A47.8010107>