Date: Fri, 16 Jan 1998 08:54:55 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bsd.port.mk patch for review Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980116084914.20775A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199801160503.VAA18085@bubble.didi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * Since for debugging purposes backups needed even if patch applies OK, > * and it is changed with new "patch", here is solution I plan to commit: > > Will this work fine with earlier versions of "patch" too? If so, I'll > commit it myself. No, I mean patch 2.5 only (-current), not patch 2.1 (-stable) -b works differently between this two versions. In case you want the same bsd.port.mk in both -current and -stable, some trick must be used to detect patch version, maybe 'patch --version' call or just simple -current detection, or adding PATCHFLAGS to sys.mk, etc. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nietzsche.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980116084914.20775A-100000>