Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 15:48:26 -0700 From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org> To: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> Cc: mckusick@FreeBSD.org, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/ps ps.c Message-ID: <20010408224827.EC04A3E09@bazooka.unixfreak.org> In-Reply-To: <200104071101.f37B1ul55453@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org>; from brian@Awfulhak.org on "Sat, 07 Apr 2001 12:01:56 %2B0100"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org> writes: > > So, the question is: do we want a `sess' column? > > Personally I preferred it *with* the sess column (my change just > removed an irritating error message - I use ``ps j'' all the time and > have eventually gotten sick of seeing it). Kirk, do you have any > objections to restoring sess ? Well, to [hopefully] make it easier for everyone, I've produced two patches: http://www.unixfreak.org/~dima/home/ps-sess.diff http://www.unixfreak.org/~dima/home/ps-tsess.diff The first one adds a ki_sess pointer to kinfo_proc. The second one adds ki_sess *and* ki_tsess pointers. They represent the session pointer and the tty session pointer, respectivley. Anyone have any objections to these? If not, anyone feel like commiting them? Thanks, Dima Dorfman dima@unixfreak.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010408224827.EC04A3E09>