Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:53:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Gary Gatten <Ggatten@waddell.com> Cc: Adam Vandemore <amvandemore@gmail.com>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Modern FreeBSD Installer? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904222352210.3729@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793EA60@WADPEXV0.waddell.com> References: <BLU0-SMTP493F2C64E33D39A37EF75DD8740@phx.gbl><714DFCFC-9547-497D-A2C7-0BA10B39B901@mac.com><49EF82B2.2040807@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904222316130.3543@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <70C0964126D66F458E688618E1CD008A0793EA60@WADPEXV0.waddell.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> IMHO numbers and letters look the same in the scary dark place, a TUI, > or GUI. Better device detection, faster, more packages, etc. would all > be "better" and should be more of a priority than making a GUI exactly. GUI don't need to have any priority, it's just don't needed AT ALL. if fancy cool graphics is important - why using FreeBSD at all? there are lot of other products both free and commercial that concentrates on it. not only installer - everything else too :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0904222352210.3729>