Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 19:39:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: cvsup.freebsd.org I/O error Message-ID: <20010528193755.I67783-100000@achilles.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <200105282234.f4SMY6x13198@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 May 2001, Matt Dillon wrote: > Yah, I figured that out... I hadn't even considered it could happen with > a brand new IBM drive! Ah well... back to the > tried-and-true-but-run-slightly-hot seacrates. > > -Matt Unfortunately, it sounds like you're not alone. If you check out various hardware message boards, there are people hopping mad about recent IBM drives having a high failure rate. :| But they support tagged queueing, so you can safely write cache! :) Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010528193755.I67783-100000>