Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:38:47 +0930
From:      "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
To:        Aisaka Taiga <spambox@haruhiism.net>
Cc:        Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, scottl@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch
Message-ID:  <200906282038.58968.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <4A473F14.70009@haruhiism.net>
References:  <4A4517BE.9040504@FreeBSD.org> <200906281758.34283.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <4A473F14.70009@haruhiism.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart42974049.KmEQ2YtpWy
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, 28 Jun 2009, Aisaka Taiga wrote:
> Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > Louis' glabel solution works for me so far :)
>
> I've experienced many weird things while trying to use glabel for
> swap partitions. I wonder where does GEOM store the label, because
> doing
>
> glabel create swap /dev/ad0s1b
>
> successfully adds a label, it shows up on boot:
>
> GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider /dev/ad0s1a is label/swap
>
> however, after a while the label is lost. Maybe the metadata is
> stored in the last sector of the swap space, and the swap data
> overwrites it, I don't know.

I think you want glabel label swap /dev/ad0s1b

'create' is the manual method which won't store any metadata - 'label'=20
stores it in the last sector of the provider.

> And the system wants me to enter the root FS name manually because
> ad0 is locked by GEOM and ad0s1a can't be mounted therefore.
> GEOM_LABEL finds the label before GEOM_MIRROR is started properly.
>
> I've experienced this behaviour on both 7.2 and, I think, 8.0 too
> (May snapshot).
> I know we don't really need labels on a gmirror because a gmirror is
> a 'label' in itself and will always appear as /dev/mirror/device-name
> no matter how we swap HDDs and no matter in which order they are
> probed, however this is still a bit strange.

I think if you use label you'd be OK (but you'd need to newfs because=20
the created provider is 1 sector smaller). The other alternative is to=20
use /dev/ufsid/xxx which won't require a newfs as your existing FS's=20
have an ID already (presuming you are using GENERIC).

=2D-=20
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C

--nextPart42974049.KmEQ2YtpWy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD)

iD4DBQBKR09K5ZPcIHs/zowRAmBrAJiqUvwg55NTaVOvnsPnEb7yVa1TAJ9lsNLE
s7rxQJRo4mV6iCzv3xvZmQ==
=rrPh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart42974049.KmEQ2YtpWy--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200906282038.58968.doconnor>