Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 22:57:02 -0500 From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@ece.cmu.edu> To: frzburn <frzburn@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap and cvsup for rebuilding world - Which one? Message-ID: <7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C@ece.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com> References: <2942dae0703031923q2887c59dh85f103bff424e7b7@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 3, 2007, at 22:23 , frzburn wrote: > So here come my questions: > Is portsnap syncing the sources correctly for rebuilding world, or > must I > use cvsup? > If so, of what use is portsnap if I must use cvsup for > synchronizing my > source? It's a little out of date; instead of cvsup, you use csup which is in the base system (and only supports updating the base system, hence portsnap). -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7358E9CA-7FAA-461D-B0F0-16A3DEBEA59C>