Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 14:06:49 -0700 (PDT) From: "Waitman Gobble" <uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com> To: "Waitman Gobble" <uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Chris Petrik <cpet@sdf.org> Subject: Re: Gnustep group Message-ID: <1363554409.51642@da3m0n8t3r.com> In-Reply-To: <1363490708.60745@da3m0n8t3r.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --bound1363554409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Waitman Gobble <uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com> wrote .. > Chris Petrik <cpet@sdf.org> wrote .. > > Looking at the current state of gnustep and I am wondering if any > > commiters would be interested in creating a gnustep group/team? as a lot > > of ports have no maintainer and would be nice if there was a ML and > > other means for gnustep ? > > > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Hi, > > Sounds great. I'm not a committer but was looking at gnustep earlier today, have > a need for a JBOS system and this could be good for a wall. It's an interesting > coincidence I suppose. > I'll check out ports status. > Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working.. it doesn't work with base clang. However, clang in ports works, and all the GNUstep modules build from svn without issue.. so it really should be a piece of cake to build some new GNUstep ports.. if there's interest. Here are my notes so far. https://dx.burplex.com/bin/gnustep.html -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA --bound1363554409--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1363554409.51642>