Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 12:31:10 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, "Eugene L. Vorokov" <vel@bugz.infotecs.ru>, Soren Kristensen <soren@soekris.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why two cards on the same segment... Message-ID: <3B64647E.85BAE179@mindspring.com> References: <20010727164602.46DBC380B@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm wrote: > Have you seen Bill Paul's FEC stuff? It works very nicely, but using the > cisco Fast EtherChannel instead of VRRP. While it isn't the same, we have > used it with four interfaces merged into one virtual interface quite > happily. I haven't played with it... does it handle one of the four dropping out, and do the right thing? Say I have four boxes, and I want to have four virtual interfaces; can you define more than one virtual interface for the group at the same time, and keep four virtual interfaces going with only three boxes? That seems like the most useful configuration (to me, anyway...). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B64647E.85BAE179>