Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:15:05 +0200
From:      Davide Italiano <davide.italiano@gmail.com>
To:        Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-projects@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r237067 - projects/calloutng/sys/kern
Message-ID:  <CACYV=-GMh0=RunBbqLZazhzxgYvCsQ8gz4Yv5ADxDkmZzUpv-w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FD9EFA3.3060904@freebsd.org>
References:  <201206141355.q5EDtqCE098157@svn.freebsd.org> <4FD9EFA3.3060904@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 14.06.2012 15:55, Davide Italiano wrote:
>>
>> Author: davide
>> Date: Thu Jun 14 13:55:52 2012
>> New Revision: 237067
>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/237067
>>
>> Log:
>> =A0 The second argument of sleepq_timedwait_sig() is priority and it doe=
s
>> not
>> =A0 concern signal caught in previous calls as I thought and the manpage
>> says.
>
>
> Are you going to fix the man page as well?
>
> --
> Andre
>

For sure, mainly because I'm trying to extend the sleepq*(9) KPI, but
it's not a short-term priority.
It seems that someone did an attempt but noone made technical review
and the contribute got lost:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/2009-May/015916.html
I'll try to fill a PR ASAP, trying to explain what I think it's wrong.

Davide



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACYV=-GMh0=RunBbqLZazhzxgYvCsQ8gz4Yv5ADxDkmZzUpv-w>