Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:43:29 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r229945 - in head/sbin: hastctl hastd Message-ID: <4F0CBF11.6080608@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201201102239.q0AMd8i6030635@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201201102239.q0AMd8i6030635@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/10/2012 14:39, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > For functions that return -1 on failure check exactly for -1 and not for > any negative number. what is the likelihood that at some point in the future the semantics for those functions will change, such that more than one negative value may be returned? -- You can observe a lot just by watching. -- Yogi Berra Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F0CBF11.6080608>