Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 01:23:28 +0000 (GMT) From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: brainstorm: "intermediate" disk caching Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0105290122130.10997-100000@www.everquick.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.32L2.0105281858470.86403-100000@shell-1.enteract.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 19:01:37 -0500 (CDT) > From: David Scheidt <dscheidt@tumbolia.com> [ snip ] > If you're really interested in database performance, remember "Spindles > is good." Spreading your IO load over as many seperate disks, on as > many independent IO channels as practical will improve performance. There's the problem. With RAID 1+0, total the storage of the spindles, and half of that is usable. With RAID 5, it asymptotically approaches unity. Eddy --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. EverQuick Internet Division Phone: (316) 794-8922 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com> To: blacklist@brics.com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.20.0105290122130.10997-100000>