Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:47:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Danial Thom <danial_thom@yahoo.com> To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ? Message-ID: <20060713164723.72788.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <389A6BC7-4CD5-4390-8EAE-A1528C9AFA36@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" <chad@shire.net> wrote: > > On Jul 13, 2006, at 9:22 AM, Danial Thom wrote: > > > Simply enabling SMP on a single processor > system > > adds 20-25% overhead in freebsd 6.1. Again, > > readily admitted/accepted by the developers. > > There is no way to recover that in > efficiency, at > > least not for a long time. > > So don't enable SMP on a single cpu system. > Easy enough to avoid. > > Chad Don't use SMP, because the overhead stays with 2 processors, with little additional benefit (as other tests show). Easy enough to avoid. Are you people stupid or delusional? DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060713164723.72788.qmail>