Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:30:51 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Initial 802.11n / ath support merge plan Message-ID: <AANLkTimz9v6bG=2vNYNfj6EMdD2YaCxnmXsWO1QByKC4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20101222165010.O6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <AANLkTi=e4u3BAzodoE7DAbuC3S2bWNwZ_0xUaDTQqN8L@mail.gmail.com> <20101222165010.O6126@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 December 2010 00:54, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: [snip my 11n plans] >> What do people think? > > Sounds like great work:-) Ta! > As 8 is still frozen and you want to setttle this in HEAD for more > than 3 days anyway have you considered posting a diff (or the diffs) > for HEAD (and stable/8) to net@ for example to get broader testing? > You might have done this already? =A0 It might be more painful to see if > you get feedback but having things tested upfront rather than needing > a couple of extra fixup commits later sounds wise. =A0I am especially > asking for the point of general infrastructure changes that affect > everyone. I'll post diffs for the net80211 changes so they may be reviewed/tested. Those changes shouldn't -change- the existing case (ie, non-802.11n.) But they're a pre-requisite to actually have a functioning 802.11n station. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimz9v6bG=2vNYNfj6EMdD2YaCxnmXsWO1QByKC4>