Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 20:07:38 +0100 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Nick Barkas <snb@freebsd.org>, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: vm_lowmem event handler for dirhash Message-ID: <20090527190738.GB17312@walton.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <4A1D70FB.6060009@elischer.org> References: <20090527103648.GA61454@ebi.local> <20090527111238.GA2000@freebsd.org> <20090527113351.GA61692@ebi.local> <4A1D70FB.6060009@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 09:57:31AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > I was initially impressed by the numbers until I saw the scales.. > a difference between 475.5 and 474 is not that significant, but if > your graph scale is from 473 to 477, it looks at first glace very > impressive. I think we felt the real gains here would be the ability to set the dirhash memory limits to a much larger value without having to worry about it chewing all your memory. The results basically confirm that we haven't introduced any serious regressions ;-) David.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090527190738.GB17312>