Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 12:59:30 -0500 From: Brandon Fosdick <bfoz@glue.umd.edu> To: clefevre@citeweb.net Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, Andreas Klemm <andreas@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PORTVERSION=6.1 wrong in linux_base-62 ??? Message-ID: <3BF55402.2D05875@glue.umd.edu> References: <200111160336.fAG3abG13456@gits.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:03:11AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > [snip] > > > For linux_base, I don't see that need. The 7.1 version > > > should include any needed 6.2 "compat" libs(bits). > > > > No. The linux_base-7 port should install a minimal set of Red Hat 7.x > > packages. If Red Hat 7.x sucks, linux_base-7 will sucks. It's that > > simple... > > I guess David was thinking to something like linux_compat-7 which > install cleanly over linux_base-7 as linux_devtools and such do. > > so, linux ports which require 7.1 are safe w/ linux_base-7 and > the ones which require 6.x are safe w/ linux_compat-7. no more > need to install linux_base-7 over linux_base or whatever... Sorry for jumping in mid-thread... Is there someway to have /compat/linux6 and /compat/linux7? i.e. run the two different versions in their own seperate linuxulators. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3BF55402.2D05875>