Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 16:26:32 -0600 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: Anti <fearow@attbi.com>, das@FreeBSD.ORG, till@f111.hadiko.de, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libm problem Message-ID: <20030322222631.GA63147@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20030322185750.GA81889@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20030318173051.GA2322@f111.hadiko.de> <20030319131317.GA670@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030321235237.GA8097@f111.hadiko.de> <20030322111233.F4471@gamplex.bde.org> <20030322005435.GA8393@f111.hadiko.de> <20030322051443.GA13854@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030322182846.GA81615@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20030322123951.67271b29.fearow@attbi.com> <20030322185750.GA81889@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Mar 22), Steve Kargl said: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 12:39:51PM -0600, Anti wrote: > > pentium3 would be better than pentiumpro on a p4 i think... > > I know pentium4 produces some strange code and I know my > system is quite stable with pentiumpro. I've never tested > what happens with pentium3. p3 is quite stable; I've been building current worls and ports with -march=pentium3 for months. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030322222631.GA63147>