Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:45:14 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: "Andrew J. Korty" <ajk@iu.edu> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:43.bind Message-ID: <20021114184514.GL23981@madman.nectar.cc> In-Reply-To: <gcbs4sui0r.fsf@kobayashi.uits.iupui.edu> References: <20021114163327.GD23981@madman.nectar.cc> <20021114.161925.95516452.ishizuka@ish.org> <200211140624.gAE6OXcA038916@freefall.freebsd.org> <20021114.161925.95516452.ishizuka@ish.org> <3.0.5.32.20021114111020.0102afe0@sage-american.com> <5.1.1.6.0.20021114122014.067d0a68@marble.sentex.ca> <20021114122907.E36056@cthulu.compt.com> <gcbs4sui0r.fsf@kobayashi.uits.iupui.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 01:24:04PM -0500, Andrew J. Korty wrote: > Why do the advisories use && at all? What's wrong with > "make depend all install"? Because `make all install' needs the results of `make depend': i.e. it includes a file generated by `make depend'. It's not `make depend && make all install' simply because I prefer to hit the default make target rather than specifying `all'. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar@celabo.org> http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021114184514.GL23981>