Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 15:04:29 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Bjoern Fischer <bfischer@Techfak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Brian: pppoe question. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0201151459190.82675-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20020115224933.GB3520@frolic.no-support.loc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian, would it be possible to specify to ppp, an arbitrary node/hook on which to attach the pppoe node? (instead of, say, xl0: I'd want to hook to etf0:pppoehook (which may have been set up beforehand by a script) (maybe a 'hookname' variable that is "orphan" by default..) may also allow other types of tunnelling. Julian (if I had this I could probably do what Bjo:rn is looking for..) On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Bjoern Fischer wrote: > Hello Julian, >=20 > > What happens if you use netgraph bridging? > > (/usr/share/examples/netgraph) >=20 > I knew that you would advertise this ;-) >=20 > Ok, since I'm already using netgraph for pppoe on the same machine, > I tried netgraph bridging at first. But with netgraph bridging it > was even worse: Not even the clients on the vr0 segment could reach > the server via broadcast (192.168.43.255). All our production > workstations are on this segment. All of them are diskless clients > using DHCP, amd with NIS maps, NIS for user DBs; so that broadcast > feature was heavily needed. >=20 > With Luigi's bridging code at least the vr0 segment was working > normally. Only the broadcast problem on the ed1 segment. I could > live with that up till now. >=20 > -Bj=F6rn >=20 >=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0201151459190.82675-100000>