Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Dec 1999 21:32:55 -0500 (EST)
From:      Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net>
To:        "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
Cc:        Motoyuki Konno <motoyuki@snipe.rim.or.jp>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed from current ?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912102127020.16082-100000@picnic.mat.net>
In-Reply-To: <3850F88D.92172FB0@newsguy.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 Dec 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:

> What Motoyuki-san is complaining about is that applications that
> depend on a.out libraries will suffer. Alas, I don't think that's
> the case, since all these libraries are (or ought to be, anyway) in
> compat.
> 
> > Looking at copious examples from real life, forcing 3rd party developers
> > to upgrade is a good way to lose 3rd party developers.  It just *sounds*
> > like a good way to go.  As long as this is a change for building world,
> > and not making changes to the kern/imgact things (so we keep on executing
> > aout binaries) then this is probably the best way to go.
> 
> OTOH, going the other way around is the reason why we (users) had to
> deal with things like 1 Mb RAM and 64 Kb segments in the age of
> 486s, one generation after the introduction of the 80386. As a free
> operating system supported by volunteer effort, we are interested in
> driving the hardware to it's limits instead of being limited by the
> ways we once did things.

Absolutely, but (here's the caveat) if it *doesn't* hold up any new
development, and there's a significant base of users actually deriving
benefit from it, then I wouldn't agree.  I'm kinda binary about that test,
because I fully agree that, if it holds up technology in a project like
ours, it's out the door!

Stopping the new aout world builds doesn't injure users of aout software,
it only *really* strongly discourages new development in aout.  I think it
just needed to be emphasized that the aout imgact stuff isn't being
tossed, so aout executables will still work (those that aren't otherwise
incompatible).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chuck Robey                | Interests include C programming, Electronics,
213 Lakeside Dr. Apt. T-1  | communications, and signal processing.
Greenbelt, MD 20770        | I run picnic.mat.net: FreeBSD-current(i386) and
(301) 220-2114             |       jaunt.mat.net : FreeBSD-current(Alpha)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9912102127020.16082-100000>