Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 13:53:47 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mirror Requirements - Last question? Message-ID: <3F17FBEB.19412.3E93010D@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20030718174703.GC9029@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 18 Jul 2003 at 13:47, Ken Smith wrote: > > There are one or two dangling loose ends but I think the only remaining > big question I have is whether or not to require Official Mirrors to > carry both the "Production Release" and the "New Technology Release" > (the terms come from the top-level Web page, 4.8 and 5.1 respectively > at the moment). > > How about "Primary Mirrors" must carry both, "Secondary Mirrors" are > only required to carry the latest Production Release? If that doesn't > seem reasonable let us know. > > Thoughts from everyone welcome but it would be nice if re@ voiced an > opinion. :-) Where do the "other" mirrors fit in? Some mirrors don't even cover the full production release. Just bin/floppies/tools etc. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F17FBEB.19412.3E93010D>