Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Feb 1999 10:24:00 -0500 (EST)
From:      "Eric I. Arnoth" <earnoth@UDel.Edu>
To:        Gianmarco Giovannelli <gmarco@scotty.masternet.it>
Cc:        mobile@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: new laptop, which system?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.01.9902181023050.479-100000@compaq.my.local.net>
In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990218162613.0098be10@194.184.65.4>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote:

> At 09.28 18/02/99 -0500, you wrote:
> If you are brave enough I'd suggest go for 4.0-current, but if you use for
> a production env. I strongly suggest 3.1-stable. I have no problem at all
> at running FreeBSD 4.0-current on my Libretto 50ct and Ast, but I am using
> them for fun ... if a day there is a problem is not a critical iussue.
> 
> 2.2.x-stable branch is out of discussion... 
Bravado has nothing to do with it, my system is mission-critical for my
graduate degree.  ;)  I take it then that 3.1-stable covers all the bases
with respect to laptop-support that PAO 2.2.8 does?



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.01.9902181023050.479-100000>