Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 12:29:24 +0100 From: "Greg Quinlan" <greg@swlct.sthames.nhs.uk> To: "Ruslan Ermilov" <ru@ucb.crimea.ua> Cc: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: GNU gcc 2.95.1 Message-ID: <010401beefb6$3fcc6a00$5214010a@qmpgmc.ac.uk> References: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9908252150230.7342-100000@monet.etfal.g12.br> <003201beef9d$e8d91f80$5214010a@qmpgmc.ac.uk> <19990826114725.F51626@relay.ucb.crimea.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
How far behind is 2.7.2.3 from 2.95.1? Is 2.95.1 considered an unknown qauntity/ quality? Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua> To: Greg Quinlan <Greg@swlct.sthames.nhs.uk> Cc: <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Sent: 26 August 1999 09:47 Subject: Re: GNU gcc 2.95.1 > On Thu, Aug 26, 1999 at 09:35:10AM +0100, Greg Quinlan wrote: > > Just out of interest more than a requirement; is their any views on updating > > the 'gcc' compiler in 3.2-Stable before the 3.3-Release September? > > > It has already been upgraded to 2.7.2.3. > > > Last time I looked it was version 2.7.2.1 (in 3.2S) and the current version > > is 2.95.1! > > > > Surely there have been some major improvements since then, and many bug > > fixes! > > > > Greg > > -- > Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA of the > ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank, > ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, > +380.652.247.647 Simferopol, Ukraine > > http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve > http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?010401beefb6$3fcc6a00$5214010a>