Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:25:03 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@csail.mit.edu> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r227070 - in head: lib/libc/sys sys/compat/freebsd32 sys/kern sys/sys sys/vm Message-ID: <20148.8175.685844.777167@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <4EB3DB96.3010605@FreeBSD.org> References: <201111040402.pA442oYZ000317@svn.freebsd.org> <201111040823.52084.avilla@freebsd.org> <4EB3DB96.3010605@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 05:33:26 -0700, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> said: > It would appear that this is the last missing piece as we already > implement posix_memalign(), posix_madvise(), and posix_fallocate(). > However, there does not seem to be an easy way on opengroup.org to > definitively list all the requirements of a given POSIX option. Can > someone on standards@ chime in on if we now fully support this option? In FreeBSD we generally define the feature-test macro if we aim to support the feature in question. If somebody finds something that's missing, and the actually *use* the POSIX feature-test macros (big "if"), then they can file a bug report to tell us what's missing. -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20148.8175.685844.777167>