Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Jul 2001 02:34:13 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Mike Heffner <mheffner@vt.edu>
Cc:        Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.ORG>, Luke Mewburn <lukem@wasabisystems.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: BSD-specific sources (was: Importing lukemftpd)
Message-ID:  <20010719023412.A30128@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20010718235039.mheffner@novacoxmail.com>; from mheffner@novacoxmail.com on Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:50:39PM -0400
References:  <20010718172357.Q69861@wantadilla.lemis.com> <XFMail.20010718235039.mheffner@novacoxmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 11:50:39PM -0400, Mike Heffner wrote:
>=20
> On 18-Jul-2001 Greg Lehey wrote:
> |=20
> | Well, interestingly enough, Luke and I were talking about cooperation
> | between the NetBSD and FreeBSD projects just over last weekend, and
> | one of the things that we decided was that it would be desirable to
> | add a new category of software to our source trees, software that is
> | used by all BSDs (well, within our terms of reference, NetBSD and
> | FreeBSD anyway).  We didn't specifically mention his ftpd: we were
> | thinking more of things like USB support.  The idea would be that we
> | might have a separate part of the source tree, like /usr/src//contrib,
> | which is maintained either by a group of people, or (preferably) one
> | person who ensures that it runs on all BSD platforms.  The latter
> | might be difficult to implement, especially for kernel code, and even
> | for userland code there would be challenges.  I've got a whole lot
> | more to say on the matter, but I'm sure that people will find a number
> | of weaknesses in my suggestions.  Feel free to pick holes in the idea.
>=20
>=20
> Yes, I think this would be a great idea, specifically for new code. Howev=
er, I
> have doubts on how succesfull successfulit would be for current code,
> especially that which has diverged significantly between the branches.

Step 1:  Synchronise the code
Step 2:  Stay in sync

:-)

Kris

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7VqmUWry0BWjoQKURAlimAKCidbhHPPw3mzUwe1CM5XQSvq1YKQCgrJv/
0PRlAKAEi9U5p8IA4uxzcPQ=
=v4l3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010719023412.A30128>