Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:18:01 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: Paolo Pisati <piso@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 102141 for review Message-ID: <44C279E9.9060002@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <200607221233.k6MCXjIL033391@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200607221233.k6MCXjIL033391@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paolo Pisati wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=102141 > > Change 102141 by piso@piso_longino on 2006/07/22 12:33:15 > > Use IF_FAST macro instead of directly checking flags, > and axe an INTR_FAST check in swi_add(): is it possible > for a software interrupt handler to have INTR_FAST defined? > did it make sense at all? > An swi is an ithread by definition, so INTR_FAST makes no sense to it. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44C279E9.9060002>