Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 06:41:10 -0800 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: [OT] Re: Outlook With FreeBSD IMAP Message-ID: <45E59486.3090109@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20070227145308.R8671@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <45E25D3A.7070308@chrismaness.com> <b34be8420702252016je5e15edl77e231266c9cec8a@mail.gmail.com> <45E2604A.4060909@chrismaness.com> <b34be8420702252240t2a0723b2qb5c60466ff04bf70@mail.gmail.com> <45e2968a.pbbjenCoLr1b8zw7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20070226124711.L89345@chylonia.3miasto.net> <0C367203-3CE2-4E7F-A2B0-8B39F0D98697@goldmark.org> <20070226214106.W38271@chylonia.3miasto.net> <45E3ADE7.6080803@u.washington.edu> <20070227145308.R8671@chylonia.3miasto.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> providing data recovery services etc... >>> >>> people are allowed to be stupid. it's natural. no need to worry >> >> Sometimes managing calendars and corporate schedules can be a pain in >> the ass. I don't see how groups like Intel could do it any other way.. > > fortunately it's not my pain :) and i'm not interested in groups like > Intel which naturally support windows and microsoft every place. <rant> Can't comment about this too much further than I have, but that statement (believing that Intel uses strictly Windows products) is not 100% correct--they use a lot of open source software and OSes, and they're at more critical points in their IT infrastruture. Windows is there just to help out with some of the more critical planning areas because it's easier than other solutions at solving planning / logisitics related problems and ties in nicely with what they have in place. I'm not saying that I love Outlook, but I wouldn't want to do my work there without it.. </rant> -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45E59486.3090109>