Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:23:54 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias <sonic2000gr@gmail.com> To: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Gabor PALI <pgj@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Sort of RFC] Ports and packages for docs Message-ID: <493447DA.1000203@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20081201194326.GA1030@gothic.blackend.org> References: <20081201080917.GA1330@gothic.blackend.org> <4933EE8D.4020001@gmail.com> <4933FC12.1060806@FreeBSD.org> <20081201194326.GA1030@gothic.blackend.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marc Fonvieille wrote: > >> - Will they be maintained separately? >> >> - Who should maintain them? (In my opinion, every localized >> documentation package content should be maintained and regulated by the >> translators themselves.) >> >> > > doceng@ (and in part re@) should maintain them, as it's done for docproj > related ports, etc. > A monthly update is planned, if people need more frequent update they > should use csup(1) etc. > > In fact, there wouldn't be much for a doc committer to maintain in such a port. You would just perform your usual work on patches, translations etc. and the port would just pick them up from CVS, build and package them. Monthly update also seems very reasonable to me. On average, I translate a chapter per month :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?493447DA.1000203>