Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:09:54 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> To: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>, Bruce Cran <brucec@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r211936 - in head: bin/test lib/libc/net lib/libc/stdio lib/libc/stdlib lib/libc/sys lib/libipx libexec/ypxfr sbin/ipfw secure/lib/libcrypto/man share/man/man4 share/man/man9 usr.sbin/I... Message-ID: <20100830160829.U1510@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20100829090607.00007cef@unknown> References: <201008281632.o7SGW18U036444@svn.freebsd.org> <20100829115717.G26978@delplex.bde.org> <20100829090607.00007cef@unknown>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:12:46 +1000 (EST) > Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >> On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, Bruce Cran wrote: >> >>> Log: >>> Fix incorrect usage of 'assure' and 'insure'. >> >> I think some of the `assure's are more correct than their replacement >> of `ensure'. The difference is subtle -- my small 1960's English >> ... > > After talking with other people I can see that quite a few probably > were correct - for example "assure a degree of consistency". > > Should all the assure -> ensure changes be reverted? Easier to revert them than to decide which are correct. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100830160829.U1510>