Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:00:50 +1100 From: Sam Lawrance <samuel.lawrance@studentmail.newcastle.edu.au> To: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, Sam Lawrance <lawrance@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports/87984: net/samba3 registers phantom dependencies Message-ID: <9E8AB1CA-0F21-4300-ADEB-9D1E657416AF@studentmail.newcastle.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <471336F9-01D9-4442-B5C9-270AC98351B2@khera.org> References: <200511140645.jAE6jR8s036012@freefall.freebsd.org> <471336F9-01D9-4442-B5C9-270AC98351B2@khera.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15/11/2005, at 2:42 AM, Vivek Khera wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2005, at 6:45 AM, Sam Lawrance wrote: > > >> These are normal packaging dependencies. All dependencies of a >> package are registered; not just the immediate dependencies >> listed in the port. >> > > If that were the case, then why were those ports listed as > dependencies not actually installed on my system? I know that a > port lists the dependencies of all of the ports on which it > depends, and that is normal. In this case, there are dependencies > that do not exist on my system, and never have. Besides none of > the other ports on my system list them as dependencies, only samba3 > does. On 6.0 release here - pkg_add -r samba3 - installs those dependencies as expected - cd /usr/ports/net/samba3 && make install - same - portupgrade sees all the dependencies correctly I think it is a possibility that those packages have been removed from your system at some stage. portupgrade -fR samba3 should bring them back.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9E8AB1CA-0F21-4300-ADEB-9D1E657416AF>