Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:02:11 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: traffic shaping on RELENG_10 ? Message-ID: <5671D153.4030501@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <5671C816.8060004@denninger.net> References: <5671C78A.4030807@sentex.net> <5671C816.8060004@denninger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/16/2015 3:22 PM, Karl Denninger wrote: > > On 12/16/2015 14:20, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> I need to do some simple traffic shaping, but whenever I try and use >> altq, I dont seem to have any luck-- I mean zero. >> >> I like the management of pf via pf.conf, but miss the simplicity of >> dummynet and ipfw. Has anyone used pf and ipfw together in RELENG10 ? >> Any tips / caveats ? Or am I better off re-writing the pf rules into >> ipfw and be done with it. >> >> ---Mike > What are you trying to do? > > I use rate-shaping in ipfw without problems and have been for quite some > time. Protect some boxes via pf, and then limit one box from eating up all the bandwidth when doing a backups and syncs. I would like to keep pf for firewall rules, and I would like to use ipfw+DUMMYNET for bandwidth shaping ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5671D153.4030501>